CAI NIST 800-53 Compliance Assessment CAI NIST 800-53 Compliance Assessment

Other case studies

The use case

Organizations operating critical infrastructure face an increasingly complex regulatory landscape. NIST 800-53 defines over 170 security controls across 18 control families, each requiring documented evidence of implementation. For enterprises pursuing FedRAMP authorization, government contracts, or simply strengthening their security posture, manual compliance assessment is a costly, error-prone, and time-consuming process.

Traditional compliance audits rely on questionnaires, documentation reviews, and spot-check verification—approaches that leave gaps, miss misconfigurations, and cannot keep pace with rapidly evolving infrastructure. Security teams spend weeks gathering evidence manually, often discovering that their "compliant" systems harbor critical vulnerabilities that questionnaires never detected.

To address this challenge, Alias Robotics developed the CAI NIST 800-53 Compliance Agent—an AI-powered assessment tool that executes real commands, gathers concrete evidence, integrates with Lynis for baseline scanning, and generates comprehensive compliance reports with CVSS-aligned risk scoring. Unlike checkbox audits, CAI operates on a core principle: trust nothing without evidence.

Get CAI
Evidence-Based Compliance in Action

This demonstration shows CAI's NIST 800-53 Compliance Agent systematically assessing a Linux system. Watch as the agent executes Lynis for baseline scanning, then methodically verifies each control family—Access Control (AC), Audit (AU), Configuration Management (CM), Identification (IA), and more—by running actual system commands. Every finding is backed by command output, not assumptions. The agent automatically correlates Lynis results with specific NIST controls, assigns CVSS-aligned risk scores, and generates a comprehensive markdown report with before/after compliance checklists and prioritized remediation guidance.

Why Evidence-Based Compliance Matters

Compliance failures aren't just audit findings—they're security gaps waiting to be exploited. The 2023 Verizon DBIR reported that 74% of breaches involved human elements, including credential misuse and configuration errors—exactly the issues that NIST 800-53 controls address. Yet traditional compliance approaches rely on self-attestation: organizations answer questionnaires claiming they have password policies, audit logging, and access controls without anyone verifying the actual system state.

CAI's NIST 800-53 Compliance Agent eliminates this gap by treating every control as unverified until proven with command output. When assessing AC-7 (Unsuccessful Logon Attempts), CAI doesn't ask "Do you have lockout policies?"—it runs grep -E "pam_tally|pam_faillock|deny=" /etc/pam.d/* and analyzes the actual PAM configuration. When checking AU-9 (Protection of Audit Information), it executes ls -la /var/log/audit/ to verify file permissions.

This evidence-based methodology transforms compliance from a documentation exercise into genuine security validation, catching misconfigurations that questionnaires miss and providing auditors with verifiable proof of control implementation.

Get CAI

About NIST 800-53

NIST Special Publication 800-53 is the gold standard for federal information security, defining security and privacy controls for federal information systems. With over 1,000 individual control enhancements organized into 20 control families, it provides the foundation for FedRAMP, FISMA, and numerous industry compliance frameworks.

Control families span technical domains (Access Control, Audit and Accountability, System Communications Protection) and operational areas (Incident Response, Contingency Planning, Personnel Security). Each control has defined assessment procedures, but the sheer volume makes comprehensive manual verification impractical—creating the compliance gap that CAI addresses.

Assessment Time

hours vs. weeks

~4-8 h



Controls Verified

170+

🎯 THE CHALLENGE

Traditional NIST 800-53 compliance assessment faces significant barriers:

  • 170+ controls requiring individual verification across multiple systems
  • Manual evidence collection taking weeks of analyst time
  • Self-attestation questionnaires that miss actual misconfigurations
  • No correlation between scanner outputs and specific NIST controls
  • Risk scoring often subjective without standardized methodology
  • Reports requiring significant manual effort to compile and format

The gap between "documented policy" and "implemented control" leaves organizations vulnerable while believing they're compliant.

🛡️ THE SOLUTION

CAI's NIST 800-53 Compliance Agent automates evidence-based assessment through:

  • Lynis Integration: Automated baseline scanning with 35+ test categories mapped to NIST controls
  • Command Execution: Real verification commands for each control family (AC, AU, CM, IA, SC, SI)
  • Evidence Collection: Every finding backed by actual command output—no assumptions
  • Risk Scoring: CVSS-aligned severity ratings (Critical/High/Medium/Low/Info)
  • Compliance Tracking: Before/after checklists showing remediation progress
  • Automated Reporting: Comprehensive markdown reports with executive summaries

🔬 CONTROL FAMILIES ASSESSED

  • AC - Access Control: User accounts, privileges, session management
  • AU - Audit: Logging, audit storage, time synchronization
  • CM - Configuration Management: Baseline configs, change control
  • IA - Identification & Authentication: Password policies, MFA
  • SC - System & Communications: Firewalls, encryption, boundaries
  • SI - System Integrity: Patching, malware protection, file integrity

Plus PE, PS, PL, RA, CA families flagged for documentation review where technical verification isn't possible.

âś… DELIVERABLES

  • Executive Summary with overall compliance score and risk distribution
  • Pre-assessment checklist showing current control status
  • Detailed findings with evidence (actual command outputs)
  • CVSS-aligned risk scores for each non-compliant control
  • Prioritized remediation recommendations (Critical → Low)
  • Post-remediation expected status showing risk reduction
  • Lynis-to-NIST correlation mapping
  • Full command audit log for verification

KEY BENEFITS

📋 Evidence over assumptions—every control verified with command output
⚡ Hours instead of weeks—automated assessment across 170+ controls
🎯 Actionable reports—prioritized remediation with specific commands

CVSS-Aligned Risk Scoring

CAI's NIST 800-53 Compliance Agent assigns risk scores using a methodology aligned with CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System), ensuring consistent, defensible severity ratings:

Severity Score Range Description Example Controls
CRITICAL 9.0 - 10.0 Immediate exploitation possible, complete system compromise AC-3 (Access Enforcement), SC-7 (Boundary Protection)
HIGH 7.0 - 8.9 Serious vulnerability, likely to be exploited AC-2 (Account Management), IA-2 (Identification), AU-2 (Audit Events)
MEDIUM 4.0 - 6.9 Moderate risk, requires some conditions to exploit AC-7 (Unsuccessful Logon), CM-6 (Configuration Settings)
LOW 0.1 - 3.9 Minor issue, limited impact AC-8 (System Use Notification), AU-11 (Audit Retention)
INFO 0.0 Informational finding, no direct risk Documentation gaps, optional enhancements